| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/01/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/01/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
JARDIM, A. M. da R. F.; MORAIS, J. E. F. de; SOUZA, L. S. B. de; MARIN, F. R.; MOURA, M. S. B. de; MORELLATO, L. P. C.; MONTENEGRO, A. A. de A.; OMETTO, J. P. H. B.; LIMA, J. L. M. P. de; DUBEUX JÚNIOR, J. C. B.; SILVA, T. G. F. da. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALEXANDRE MANIÇOBA DA ROSA FERRAZ JARDIM, UFRPE; JOSÉ EDSON FLORENTINO DE MORAIS, UFRPE, Serra Talhada, PE; LUCIANA SANDRA BASTOS DE SOUZA, UFRPE, Serra Talhada, PE; FABIO RICARDO MARIN, USP; MAGNA SOELMA BESERRA DE MOURA, CPATSA; LEONOR PATRICIA CERDEIRA MORELLATO, UNESP, Rio Claro, SP; ABELARDO ANTÔNIO DE ASSUNÇÃO MONTENEGRO, UFRPE; JEAN PIERRE HENRY BALBAUD OMETTO, INPE; JOÃO L. M. P. DE LIMA, MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ARNET – Aquatic Research Network, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Sciences and Technology; JOSÉ CARLOS BATISTA DUBEUX JÚNIOR, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida; THIERES GEORGE FREIRE DA SILVA, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Serra Talhada, PE. |
|
Título: |
Sink or carbon source? how the Opuntia cactus agroecosystem interacts in the use of carbon, nutrients and radiation in the Brazilian semi-arid region. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Hydrology, v. 625, 130121, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130121 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Anthropogenic disturbances directly influence environmental processes and increase the concentration of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Here, we compare the differences in the seasonality of the balance of carbon, energy, and radiation, as well as seek to identify the interrelationships between these environmental variables and their impact on the growth of Opuntia cactus. Data were acquired from an eddy covariance flux tower over a cactus crop agroecosystem (2019–2021) in the Brazilian semi-arid region. In addition, we use plant growth rates, carbon and nutrient stocks, evapotranspiration (ET) and water use efficiency (WUE), and radiation (RUE). We show that the closure of the surface energy balance was 71%, although there are minimal fluxes of available energy lost (29%) by unquantified processes. At all seasons, the highest net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) rate was between 11:00–13:00 (�� 5.75 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1). During the dry and wet-dry season, there was the lowest daily gross primary productivity (GPP) (2.5 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1) and net radiation—Rn (217.97 W m�� 2). Ecosystem respiration was more expressive during the wet season (2.41 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1), and maximum diurnal value of 2.65 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1. Furthermore, the latent heat flux was higher during the wet season (114.68 W m�� 2) and lowered in the dry season (9.39 W m�� 2). The net assimilation rate showed higher values during the dry-wet transition. The dry season presented higher nutrient use efficiency and WUE (14.77 g m�� 2 mm�� 1). The highest ET occurred during the wet season (227 mm), and RUE was 81.48% higher than in the dry season. Overall, the cactus was a potential C sink during the three years of assessment (NEE: �� 377 g C m�� 2 year�� 1; GPP: 881 g C m�� 2 year�� 1). The results help us to understand that most of the Rn energy is used in the sensible heat flux (58% ratio). MenosAnthropogenic disturbances directly influence environmental processes and increase the concentration of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Here, we compare the differences in the seasonality of the balance of carbon, energy, and radiation, as well as seek to identify the interrelationships between these environmental variables and their impact on the growth of Opuntia cactus. Data were acquired from an eddy covariance flux tower over a cactus crop agroecosystem (2019–2021) in the Brazilian semi-arid region. In addition, we use plant growth rates, carbon and nutrient stocks, evapotranspiration (ET) and water use efficiency (WUE), and radiation (RUE). We show that the closure of the surface energy balance was 71%, although there are minimal fluxes of available energy lost (29%) by unquantified processes. At all seasons, the highest net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) rate was between 11:00–13:00 (�� 5.75 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1). During the dry and wet-dry season, there was the lowest daily gross primary productivity (GPP) (2.5 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1) and net radiation—Rn (217.97 W m�� 2). Ecosystem respiration was more expressive during the wet season (2.41 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1), and maximum diurnal value of 2.65 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1. Furthermore, the latent heat flux was higher during the wet season (114.68 W m�� 2) and lowered in the dry season (9.39 W m�� 2). The net assimilation rate showed higher values during the dry-wet transition. The dry season presented higher nutrient use efficiency and WUE (1... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroecossistema; Cacto de sequeiro; Concentração de carbono; Covariância de redemoinho; Opuntia cactus; Planta CAM; Semiárido; Sumidouro ou fonte de carbono; Troca líquida de CO2. |
|
Thesagro: |
Caatinga; Cacto; Carbono; Ecossistema; Evapotranspiração. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Evapotranspiration; Opuntia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1161040/1/Sink-or-carbon-source-how-the-Opuntia-cactus-agroecosystem-interacts-in-the-use-of-carbon-nutrients-and-radiation-in-the-Brazilian-semi-arid-region.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03353naa a2200445 a 4500
001 2161040
005 2024-01-23
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130121$2DOI
100 1 $aJARDIM, A. M. da R. F.
245 $aSink or carbon source? how the Opuntia cactus agroecosystem interacts in the use of carbon, nutrients and radiation in the Brazilian semi-arid region.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aAnthropogenic disturbances directly influence environmental processes and increase the concentration of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Here, we compare the differences in the seasonality of the balance of carbon, energy, and radiation, as well as seek to identify the interrelationships between these environmental variables and their impact on the growth of Opuntia cactus. Data were acquired from an eddy covariance flux tower over a cactus crop agroecosystem (2019–2021) in the Brazilian semi-arid region. In addition, we use plant growth rates, carbon and nutrient stocks, evapotranspiration (ET) and water use efficiency (WUE), and radiation (RUE). We show that the closure of the surface energy balance was 71%, although there are minimal fluxes of available energy lost (29%) by unquantified processes. At all seasons, the highest net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) rate was between 11:00–13:00 (�� 5.75 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1). During the dry and wet-dry season, there was the lowest daily gross primary productivity (GPP) (2.5 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1) and net radiation—Rn (217.97 W m�� 2). Ecosystem respiration was more expressive during the wet season (2.41 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1), and maximum diurnal value of 2.65 μmol m�� 2 s�� 1. Furthermore, the latent heat flux was higher during the wet season (114.68 W m�� 2) and lowered in the dry season (9.39 W m�� 2). The net assimilation rate showed higher values during the dry-wet transition. The dry season presented higher nutrient use efficiency and WUE (14.77 g m�� 2 mm�� 1). The highest ET occurred during the wet season (227 mm), and RUE was 81.48% higher than in the dry season. Overall, the cactus was a potential C sink during the three years of assessment (NEE: �� 377 g C m�� 2 year�� 1; GPP: 881 g C m�� 2 year�� 1). The results help us to understand that most of the Rn energy is used in the sensible heat flux (58% ratio).
650 $aEvapotranspiration
650 $aOpuntia
650 $aCaatinga
650 $aCacto
650 $aCarbono
650 $aEcossistema
650 $aEvapotranspiração
653 $aAgroecossistema
653 $aCacto de sequeiro
653 $aConcentração de carbono
653 $aCovariância de redemoinho
653 $aOpuntia cactus
653 $aPlanta CAM
653 $aSemiárido
653 $aSumidouro ou fonte de carbono
653 $aTroca líquida de CO2
700 1 $aMORAIS, J. E. F. de
700 1 $aSOUZA, L. S. B. de
700 1 $aMARIN, F. R.
700 1 $aMOURA, M. S. B. de
700 1 $aMORELLATO, L. P. C.
700 1 $aMONTENEGRO, A. A. de A.
700 1 $aOMETTO, J. P. H. B.
700 1 $aLIMA, J. L. M. P. de
700 1 $aDUBEUX JÚNIOR, J. C. B.
700 1 $aSILVA, T. G. F. da
773 $tJournal of Hydrology$gv. 625, 130121, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/07/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/01/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Autoria/Organização/Edição de Livros |
|
Autoria: |
FERRAZ, R. P. D.; PRADO, R. B.; PARRON, L. M.; CAMPANHA, M. M. (ed.). |
|
Afiliação: |
RODRIGO PECANHA DEMONTE FERRAZ, CNPS; RACHEL BARDY PRADO, CNPS; LUCILIA MARIA PARRON VARGAS, CNPF; MONICA MATOSO CAMPANHA, CNPMS. |
|
Título: |
Marco referencial em serviços ecossistêmicos. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. |
|
Páginas: |
121 p. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. color. |
|
ISBN: |
978-85-7035-909-4; 978-85-7035-931-5 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
E-book, no formato ePub, convertido do livro impresso. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Serviços ecossistêmicos: uma abordagem conceitual; Serviços ecossistêmicos: histórico e evolução; Serviços ecossistêmicos: instrumentos legais e políticos no Brasil; Serviços ecossistêmicos: relações com a agricultura; Serviços ecossistêmicos: pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Selo ODS 15; Serviços Ambientais. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Meio Ambiente. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agriculture; Ecosystem services; Sustainable development. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/204553/1/Marco-Referencial-em-Servicos-Ecossistemicos-2019.epub
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/205733/1/Marco-Referencial-em-Servicos-Ecossistemicos-2019.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01048nam a2200265 a 4500
001 2110948
005 2023-01-23
008 2019 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFERRAZ, R. P. D.
245 $aMarco referencial em serviços ecossistêmicos.
260 $aBrasília, DF: Embrapa$c2019
300 $a121 p.$cil. color.
500 $aE-book, no formato ePub, convertido do livro impresso.
520 $aServiços ecossistêmicos: uma abordagem conceitual; Serviços ecossistêmicos: histórico e evolução; Serviços ecossistêmicos: instrumentos legais e políticos no Brasil; Serviços ecossistêmicos: relações com a agricultura; Serviços ecossistêmicos: pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação.
650 $aAgriculture
650 $aEcosystem services
650 $aSustainable development
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aDesenvolvimento Sustentável
650 $aMeio Ambiente
653 $aSelo ODS 15
653 $aServiços Ambientais
700 1 $aPRADO, R. B.
700 1 $aPARRON, L. M.
700 1 $aCAMPANHA, M. M.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
